Monthly Archives: February 2003

Susanna Cornett has some pertinent comments on an E&P article about “embedded” journalists — those reporters assigned to cover the war in Iraq.

In a new initiative, reporters will, for the first time since Vietnam, be allowed to travel with the troops, cover the battle fronts, get the real story.

I think it’s a good thing. And I think Suzanna is also right — any hyper-paranoia about censorship is misplace. I’ve been a military man and I’ve been a reporter. I think I see this issue from both sides. Access is great. It’s more than great. It’s wonderful. But there are some things about military operations that reporters should not report. Continue reading →

Russ Harper is nice to me, so I must post just one more time about the LA blogger thing … go read his post.

Also, thanks to my buddies Ken and Emmanuelle (and Matt, indirectly) for the links … you guys drive great traffic. Continue reading →

One of the most popular posts I’ve ever done is this one about Connie Chung.

Now I learn from Romenesko that “insiders” at CNN are unhappy with Chung, but hey, they’re not going to oust her or anything. I can’t help but wonder if some of those “insiders” aren’t picking up on the general negative internet vibes spinning around out there about Chung. I mean, I didn’t realize the depth of dislike for the CNN incarnation of Chung until I picked up on Dave Barry’s little jab at her.

If CNN really had its ear to the ground, they’d chuck Chung now. Continue reading →

Hey, all you beautiful peoples hopping over from Tim Blair … thanks for stopping by. Tim was so kind with his praise, I hope this site lives up to your expectations. I don’t necessarily think I’ve been doing my best work lately, so I want to invite you back. I think I can do better. And drop me a line with the contact link on the right, or leave a comment … would love to get your feedback. Continue reading →

If you missed my post on the LA blogging gathering and after-party, it’s here. Now, Joshua Ferguson has added to the history, including (hey — it’s the first picture of me on somebody else’s web log) of me and Layne, here. Continue reading →

Sitting in a Thai restaurant (Palms) in Hollywood last night, I came to a realization: Just like everybody should have at least one friend who owns a truck, everybody should know at least one Matt Welch — that is a person who knows a particular locale so well that you’re never going to get bad advice from him.

Once again, Mr. Welch found the perfect dining establishment for my wife and I. Great food and charming entertainment — Thai’s singing kareoke cowboy songs, though we didn’t get to see the Thai Elvis perform. Maybe next time.

Dinner, for just me and my wife, came after the L.A. Bloggers panel arranged and hosted by Cathy Seipp at the American Film Institute. The official gathering, attended by about 200 people, maybe less, was followed by a smaller after-party at Heather Havrilesky‘s apartment in Los Feliz.

The blogger panel, which we arrived at 30 minutes late because of an accident on the 101, was smart, insightful and wide ranging. I started to take notes, but found my once-skilled note taking abilities have declined precipitously and the discussion was just too darn interesting not to give it my full attention. Matt Welch and Ken Layne were their usual profoundly witty selves; Eugene Volokh was, as expected, discerning and keenly judicious; Emmanuelle Richard kept reminding us not to think of blogging as purely a political activity (which it is not); Mickey Kaus was appropriately cynical; RiShawn Biddle showed a perspicacious understanding of the media; Havrilesky helped keep the whole blogging thing in perspective by reminding us how little it pays; and Luke Ford once again showed us what a charmingly off-beat fellow he is.

There was much talk about the political orientation of the blogosphere, which many people think seems to tilt right. Eugene was quick to point out that there has been no scientific study of the politics of the blogosphere and such conclusions are based on purely a subjective tiny sampling of the blog universe. Emmanualle added that there is a whole world of blogs out there that have nothing to do with politics, and are also highly entertaining.

My personal take is that the blogosphere does tilt very libertarian, but that doesn’t necessarily mean conservative. The entire internet for as long as I’ve been on it (1995) has been strongly libertarian. The first adopters were highly independent people, which influences their politics. And the same personality types that were drawn to the net before many of their peers were also drawn to blogging sooner. You can be a lefty libertarian, which is why I say that most blogs (of both the left and the right) tilt libertarian. Generally, speaking. Though I do agree with Kaus that it would be possible, and somebody should do it, to actually scientifically study the socio-political nature of blogs.

For more on the panel, read Luke.

After the panel there was food and wine in the foyer, where I met Stewart and Russ. I also met Michael (who, at the time, I didn’t realize is from my home town of San Diego). Michael, who sat in the audience with his laptop taking notes, has a good detailed post on the event. Joh3n also took notes on his laptop, but says details will follow later.

Both Joh3n and Michael were meeting Tony Pierce in person for the first time, as was I. And as Michael observes, Pierce is a totally kind, humble and interesting man. (My pictures of this meeting did not turn out, as did none of my post-AFI pictures, because I forgot to turn my flash on). Tony and I got to talk more at the Heather party, were we got deeply into a fascinating discussion of Christianity, LSD and the nature of Satan.

The after-party was the usual suspects mostly — the people I knew were Layne, Welch, Emmanuelle, Charlie Hornberger and his wife Bonnie, Heather, Pierce, RiShawn, Kaus (whom I didn’t get to talk to), Cathy, Axel … and I’m sure I’m leaving somebody out, and a bunch of people I didn’t know. There was much talk of BBQ, Mescal, North Carolina (three women in the crowd, including my wife and Heather are from NC), religion (including some interesting offshoot of Judaism that includes a belief in reincarnation), L.A. media gossip, TIVO, various TV shows and movies, Julie London vs. Peggy Lee, and the size of Heather’s apartment.

Oh, and the police came by at about 2 a.m. The outside portion of the party was arguing the relative merits of some movie or other a bit too loudly.

Billie and I left at 3 a.m., and there were still a dozen people left having a grand time. None of them have updated their blogs yet today, so as far as I know, they’re all still there.

UPDATE: Rand Simberg has a must-read post on the panel.

UPDATE: Steve Smith has some good observations about last night’s event, as does the aforementioned Stewart, whom I should add was just so damn likeable that I’m tempted to start calling him Stew. But then I’ve never met a welshman I disliked. Continue reading →