Monthly Archives: March 2005

Here we go again … a third podcast. This time we cover the travails of my laptop, the travails of the San Diego Padres and wrap up with a little more rockabilly and another installment of Miss Billie’s helpful hints. RSS.

Continue reading →

OK, the second podcast is up. This time my wife participates. We talk about David Shaw’s LAT piece on bloggers and confidential source and the movie “Million Dollar Baby” (spoiler alert!). Here’s the MP3 link and here’s the RSS link.

Continue reading →

LAT media critic makes a fool of himself, and Matt Welch is there to shine a light on him sentence by idiotic sentence. Robert Fisk has been rebutted less thoroughly. I really have nothing to add. Read the whole thing, as they say.

Continue reading →

I lied. I did create an RSS feed for my new podcast. Here it is. Will it stay? Will I populate it regularly? Who knows?

I lied on my first podcast. This is just an experiment. I wanted to see if I could do it. And, you know, what? I can. Here it is.

Don’t be surprised if I do it again. Don’t be surprised if I don’t. I imagine I will. It’s fun.

Oh, I also lied about the echo … sounds fine to me. It sounded more echoie in the headphones. Sounds fine listening to it now.

UPDATE: Oops, looks like I lied again. I’m using Icerocket to create my RSS feed, and Ipodder doesn’t recognize it is a valid podcast RSS feed, and looking at it, I can see why. The “link” element isn’t really a link element, but cdata, which sucks. I can’t really have a podcast without a proper RSS feed, so I’m not sure what I’m going to do.

SECOND UPDATE: So I ran the Icerocket RSS feed through FeedBurner and came up with this feed that actually seems to work with iPodder (it’s the whole enclosure thing), so see if this works better for you. Continue reading →

If you have ever been a record collector, you may have found yourself at some point staring and the label, and your eye wondered to the outer ring where some scribbles caught your eye — this was the rare practice of LP graffiti. Here’s an example on my Buzznet site.

Continue reading →

Something I’ve thought about before, and Businesspundit is now suggesting — the creation of a .blog top-level domain. Makes sense to me. I’m not sure I would register howardowens.blog, but I might.

Continue reading →

AFP sued. Google blinked.

The first shot of the counter revolution has been fired.

The Topix deal not withstanding, AFP’s seeming victory may embolden other media companies to take a stand against the aggregators, especially those such as Google News, Topix and Moreover that don’t pay licensing fees (as far as I know, Yahoo! forks over big bucks to the wire services included in Yahoo! News, but none of the others do, as far as I know.)

A few days ago, I was laughing at AFP for not “getting it.” I’m reconsidering my elitist sneer.

A pure aggregator, meaning a site that does nothing more than provide links and headlines, is building a business model on the original content of other companies — companies that often make big investments in the gathering and dissemination of information. Is it really fair for big corporations, such as Google, to take market share from other businesses and give nothing back?

You might argue that Google generates that ever sought-after commodity called traffic, but depending on the site, much of that traffic may be unwanted bandwidth-sucking leeches. If the traffic isn’t part of the target audience, the audience the news site can use to generate revenue, such as a local news site looking for a local audience, then Google isn’t doing the site any favors.

Maybe it’s time for big media companies to say “enough is enough. The free ride is over.”

The aggregators do dilute a media company’s ability to derive revenue from its product.

Is it unfair for media companies to expect the aggregates to pay a licensing fee to original content companies? I vote for a pay-per-click model.

Of course, media companies that stand up to Google may find themselves in a similar fight with other media companies. Think: branded RSS readers. There’s a growing trend there, and you can’t exactly expect to include another company’s feed in your reader if you’re demanding licensing fees from the aggregators. At the same time, I can answer my own counter argument: If you’re a media company putting an RSS feed out there, you’re just asking for it to be consumed, so what copyright protections do you deserve then? Steve Yelvington has dealt with this issue previously. It’s not an easy question to answer. Yet.

So where does this leave citizen journalism?

Try, fair use. It’s perfectly acceptable for a blogger to deep link to a news story (AFP or otherwise) and comment on it. The blogger is creating an original derivative work. I don’t expect that practice to ever be seriously challenged. Hell, smart media companies realize that is exactly the kind of attention they want.

For all the bloggers defending Google, they might want to think about where they would be without big media creating the content they love to disparage. Good reporting, hell, even bad reporting, takes money to produce. Media companies deserve the same opportunity as anybody else to derive a profit from the fruits of their labor. The non-licensing aggregators do pose a threat to media revenue models.

One final point that needs to be made — AFP is a little different from many of the media companies included in Google News. AFP is a wire service. It sells its stories to customers, and Google was able gather AFP links from AFP’s customers, thereby diluting the overall value of AFP content to potential future customers. Also, it’s safe to assume that Google competitor Yahoo! is paying AFP to publish its stories. So the stakes are a little higher for AFP than many other media companies. You might argue that AFP could tell its customers to block Google’s robot (with a robot.txt), but what if an AFP customer doesn’t completely comply? What is AFP going to do, start suing its customers? I don’t think so. The only option was to go after Google.

Continue reading →

If you’re a consumer, remember, Hollywood hates you.

Continue reading →

Remember the days when office conversations began with, “Did you see Seinfeld last night?”

Around my office, at least among the people I chat with socially, conversations are more likely to begin with, “Have you watched Deadwood yet?“

Call it the TiVo Effect.

Continue reading →