Howard Owens is a digital media pioneer. He started publishing local news online in 1995 when very few local news outlets had web sites. The header image on the site depicts the film camera he used early in his career and the press pass from his year on the staff of the Carlsbad Journal. For more on Howard's professional background, read his LinkedIn profile.
HowardOwens.com is the personal web site of Howard Owens and covers his range of interests -- political localism and libertarianism, music and personal interests, as well as his professional interests.
Howard is currently publisher of The Batavian and lives in Batavia, N.Y.
- Joel Osserman on About
- Joel Osserman on NewzJunky.com is a warning shot for all newspaper publishers
- JoAnn McFarland on ‘Lede’ vs. ‘Lead’
- Russell Eberts on ‘Lede’ vs. ‘Lead’
- CUNY’s MA and certificate in entrepreneurial journalism | Memphis Jpreneurs on You should only work this hard if you own the business
TagsAdvertising Audience Growth blogging blogs Books Business comments Community disruption ethics film Gadgets GateHouse Media history Home Towns Innovation Journalism local news Media Movies MP3 of the Day Music news news business newspapers Paid Content participation Patch Personal Appearances photography point-and-shoot publish2 Reinventing Journalism reporting Site Design Society Sports Strategy Tech topix Video Web-First Publishing web2.0 web navigation Writing
Daily Archives: February 17, 2007
The problem is that the hopes that Dan Gillmor raised for the media industry in his book â€” which kicked off this whole business â€” have largely failed. . . .There is actually a media revolution in the works. So whatâ€™s going on here? By implicit definition, participatory media is non-commercial. If itâ€™s commercial, someone owns it, and itâ€™s not â€œweâ€? anymore.
There we disagree. Thatâ€™s the problem with PayPerPost, not with commercially supported media, big or small. And we have not even begun to plumb the possibilities of commercially supported networks of small media.
I think Rick’s basic mistake, and one that Jarvis doesn’t correct, is that Rick is seeing “we media” as just another entity. He’s seeing the companies that do Web 2.0 sort of things as ends rather than something you ignore at your own peril. We Media exists, but not in any way that can be corralled by a definition that makes it a thing. And no company, or any collection of companies or individuals can own it. It is not a thing. It is an experience. You can’t own the conversation. You can only participate. And you can’t avoid participation. Every person, company or organization that puts communication out there is part of the conversation, whether it knows it, cares about it, likes it … or not.
To judge We Media by any piece of its parts is to miss the point. The conversation has always been there — in letters to the editor, in coffee-shop banter, in water-cooler talk — it’s just that digital media is bringing it to the fore in ways that are new, different, more egalitarian, more distributed, and I would say better.