I’m putting some polish on my strategy presentation and felt I needed to explain disruption a little better, especially in regards to newspaper video.
Here is my brief definition of disruption: “The basic idea of disruption is to start at the low end, fulfilling a job to be done, with a product that is just ‘good enough.’”
Here are my key points for a disruptive video strategy:
- Jobs to be done
- Provide readers with additional visual information about stories
- Give them more visual news-related options than TV
- Communicate in a direct, personal voice, not like TV
- Start at the low end
- Point-and-shoot cameras
- Inexpensive or installed (free) video editing software
- Short, quick-to-produce videos
- Be good enough
- Rely on current news room staff, who know news and story telling
- Provide starter training, improving as we go
- Don’t get bogged down in trying to be like TV
One of the statements I’m incorporating into my spiel (again, the focus is on crafting a disruptive newspaper video strategy) is that any newspaper video that takes more than an hour to produce isn’t worth the ROI. Quantity is the key goal. The only quality goal is to be “good enough.”


