About
Howard Owens is a digital media pioneer. He started publishing local news online in 1995 when very few local news outlets had web sites. The header image on the site depicts the film camera he used early in his career and the press pass from his year on the staff of the Carlsbad Journal. For more on Howard's professional background, read his LinkedIn profile.
HowardOwens.com is the personal web site of Howard Owens and covers his range of interests -- political localism and libertarianism, music and personal interests, as well as his professional interests.
Howard is currently publisher of The Batavian and lives in Batavia, N.Y.
Howard on the Web
Recent Comments
- Anthony jhon on Ten things journalists can do to reinvent journalism, the new list
- Carmen Bojanowski on Ten things journalists can do to reinvent journalism, the new list
- Anonymous on Chris Tolles brings some stats to the anonymous vs. registration debate
- Anonymous on Chris Tolles brings some stats to the anonymous vs. registration debate
- A Weekly Roundup of Small-Business News - NYTimes.com on Paywalls create opportunities for local news entrepreneurs
Archives
Tags
Advertising Audience Growth blogging blogs Books Business comments Community disruption ethics film Gadgets GateHouse Media history Home Towns Innovation Journalism local news Media Movies MP3 of the Day Music news newspapers online Paid Content participation Patch Personal Appearances photography point-and-shoot publish2 Reinventing Journalism reporting Site Design Society Sports Strategy Tech topix Video Web-First Publishing web2.0 web navigation WritingShare
Meta
Monthly Archives: January 2008
Yes, Virginia, blogs are a competitive threat to MSM businesses
There was a time when I considered CNet the go-to place for technology news.
It’s been three years at least since CNet was a habit.
And I’m not alone in concluding that CNet is now largely irrelevant.
“There are other sites now where you can get serious technology news,” says CNET user Alan Wilensky, a San Mateo, Calif., analyst who advises companies on their Internet strategies. He used to read CNET.com daily but is now more likely to go to rival tech sites such as TechCrunch and Engadget. “I’ve gone totally cold on CNET,” says Mr. Wilensky, who has no link with CNET or the dissident investors.
What’s killing CNet: Blogs.
You could even make the case that blogs killed Business 2.0 (link to historical artifact — note no updates since October, decades ago in Internet years).
The tech sector was the first media sector where we saw blogging really take hold — in pre 9/11 days, which spurred political blogging. Since then, we’ve seen an explosion in blog growth, both in shear numbers and in the large volume of quality blogs covering a wide range of topics.
Local blogging has been growing. Some of it is very good.
Journalists shouldn’t be too quick to conclude that blogs are not a threat to their local newspaper monopolies.
Yet, we continue to hear from MSM journalists who dismiss blogging, such as this from a reader calling himself Tito:
A blog is no more than an online journal or column, if you want to use an industry term. A blog doesn’t make me a better journalist nor does a blog make you a journalist and blogging is certainly not where the industry is headed.
Such a narrow view of blogs is to completely fail to understand blogs.
And to so easily dismiss blogs as a competitive threat is to fall on the wrong sword in the name of “quality journalism” (whatever you may mean by that).
And as the WSJ link above notes, more and more bloggers are figuring out how to generate handsome revenue to off set their low overhead. Continue reading
Tagged big media, blogging, blogs, Journalism, mainstream media
1 Comment
The modern journalist just gets the job done
If you don’t know Dan Kennedy, you should. He’s a former media critic and current journalism professor in the Boston area.
He runs a great blog called Media Nation. Mostly, he blogs about New England politics and civic affairs, but he also covers local media.
Today, he did a post about a GateHouse Media reporter, Cathryn Keefe O’Hare.
He tagged along with this modern journalist as she covered an MLK-day event. She took notes, shot video and stills with her Casio, and posted story and video to her site.
Is it a great video? No. Does it help get names and faces online? Yes. Does it help provide some context to the story? Of course. In other words, it does its job.
Dan’s concludes:
“The thing that remains true, whether it’s in print journalism or the Internet or video, you have to tell a story,” says O’Hare. “And you have to tell it as true as you can make it. And you have to try to speak for those people who can’t tell their story.”
The modern journalist just gets the job done.
And, most importantly, learns along the way. Continue reading
Tagged blogs, Journalism, Media, newspapers, Video
7 Comments
The decentralized, unpackaged media world
Howard Weaver linked to this post from Zac Echola before I saw it, but it’s an important map of how the wired get and filter news.
The following quote should be required reading in every newsroom in the U.S. tomorrow morning.
Shortly after polls closed last night, my wife got a text message from Obama’s campaign. He was the projected winner of the South Carolina primary.
A few minutes later I logged into Gmail, where Obama had already sent me an email about the victory and where I could watch his speech.
About a half an hour later a friend in Washington sent me a text with the percentage breakdowns.This morning I logged on to Facebook to see a notification from Obama, a simple copy/paste job from the email sent earlier.
Sometime today, I’ll watch his speech and Clinton’s concession speech on YouTube, since I was busy playing Super Mario Galaxy while he actually gave the speech.
Except for a CNN breaking update I got via Twitter last night (after Obama’s text message), I knew who won the primary without ever seeing a newspaper or TV site.
Only today, when I checked CNN’s excellent primary elections section did I go to an MSM site. News that I care about comes to me, despite the source.
I, like many other people, only go looking for news (on my days off) if something has first come to me to pique my interest. Then I find a site with valuable, contextual information laid out in a way that I can explore the data (in this case, exit polls). I can passively receive information I’d like to know.
If you’re not actively seeking out your audience, you’re doing something wrong.
Media organizations should be doing the same thing Obama does. It should be everywhere I am and it should provide valuable, easy-to-use added context and content if and when I decide to hit their sites.
There’s obviously one point to be made here — that news organizations need to make it a practice to push out their content to every available channel.
But the other lesson is: Your audience is also sharing what they know, either informally, or via special-interest sources. The big question is, when your audience wants more and trusted information, are they going to find it on your web site as soon as they want it?
Web-first publishing needs to become a newsroom habit. It’s the thing you do automatically, so that when any size story breaks, and your audience wants more and trusted information — and a place to discuss it — your site is ready for them. Continue reading
Tagged Media, news, newspapers, sharing, television, Web-First Publishing
Leave a comment
Introducing MediaGeeks.org – custom search for media professionals
For many months, I’ve wanted to play around with setting up a vertical search engine using Google Custom Search.
Today, I finally got around to it.
Here it is: MediaGeeks.org, a vertical search engine for media professionals.
The initial group of 140 URLs I’ve fed into the search engine are mostly from my blog roll along with obvious media sites (such as E&P and OJR).
If you know of a media site I should have included but didn’t, send me an e-mail to howard owens (one word) -at- gmail dot com.
Also, if you view the source of the home page, you can see how to add the MediaGeeks.org search widget to your blog or site.
The search engine is only useful to the media community uses it, so link to it. Tel your friends. Continue reading
Tagged custom search, Media, newspapers, radio, search, television
Leave a comment
Six roles, or job duties, of modern journalism
In the era of Packaged Goods Media, the journalist played a command-and-control role. He or she determined the news of the day (news judgment), organized it around his or her own sense of importance (news value) and published it to a compliant audience.
The role was linear and uncomplicated.
In the era of distributed media, the relationship between journalist and audience is asymmetrical.
As “audience” transmutes to “community,” and the level of communication and information increases exponentially, as news becomes less ecclesiastical and more egalitarian, the role of the professional journalist is changing.
Fortunately, there is still a role.
Here are six roles the modern journalist should serve:
- The Ethical Role. Yes, journalists get bashed about because of real and imagined lapses in ethics, but the challenge now is to raise the bar on professional ethics, and then provide ethical guidence to today’s participatory audience. We should deal more swiftly and transparently with ethical errors within the profession, but we should also provide teaching tools on information ethics, what ethics means and why it’s important, and how to spot compromised ethics.
- The Guide/Filter Role. Editors and reporters should assume some responsibility for providing their audiences with pointers to the best stuff on the web, be it the best-reported of the important news or the most interesting and entertaining articles and videos. In a command-and-control environment, we cared only about directing people to what we ourselves did. Now our role is to help audiences sift through the glut of information assaulting them daily by providing pointers. This is the value-add role, and if done right it can help overcome the digital-age tendency for people to focus too narrowly on their own interests. If done well, it will bring more people to your site or publication.
- The Understanding and Context Role. Why should the best bloggers get to have all the fun? The best journalists should become the best bloggers. I know many really, really smart reporters and editors. These people should have blogs, and they should serve readers better by taking the news of the day and putting it in context, combing articles for the tidbits that need to be weaved together to make a bigger whole, and explaining what it all means.
- The Conversation Leader Role. Already, our news reports start a lot of conversations with our without our consent. The conversation-starter role should become explicit in our job descriptions. Once started, we should guide it. We should thank and encourage the good contributors, and depreciate the bad contributors We should highlight the smartest things people say. We should provide our own insights and supplemental knowledge to any conversation we find. We should be full participants, not just the lurking overlords of top-down media.
- The Aggregator Role. We should aggressively gather data related to the communities we serve. We should make sure that anything that is knowable about a community we serve is findable through resources we provide. While in the Guide/Filter Role we might provide pointers, in the Aggregator Role, we make data available and let people find it for themselves. This is a role that serves the long tail of information, because we never know what other individuals might find useful, important or necessary.
- The Straight News Role. We cannot, even if we wanted to, and should not, cede our professional responsibilities to uncover news. We must know about everything important going on in the communities that we serve, and we should strive to be the first to tell our communities about the important news of the moment (note: no longer of the day, but of the moment). We must still be out in our communities gathering facts and organizing them in a way that is relevant and useful and then reporting the most important facts to our communities.
Previously: Journalism has evolved to fit society’s needs and demands Continue reading
Tagged Community, Journalism, reporting
10 Comments
WiredJournalists.com passes 400 members in three days
It’s pretty cool to see so many people jumping on board with Wired Journalists.
There’s a positive energy behind it that gets beyond any worries about a dying industry, the struggle to keep up or hand wringing about who is or isn’t doing what? The people signing up seem real eager to learn or to help others.
I like what Zac Echola said about the site in his post:
We’re done talking doom and gloom. We’re done making lists of what we should do to better serve our audiences. We’re going to start checking off items. We will better serve our audiences.
We want you to join us.
Like I said, a positive energy.
WiredJournalists.com is starting to feel like a petition drive — people joining together to say, “I believe in the future of journalism, and I believe that future is wired.”
Come join the fun. Continue reading
Introducing WiredJournalists.com, a place people looking for new knowledge to get help
For journalists just starting down the path of transforming their careers and doing the hard work of saving journalism … there is now WiredJournalists.com, the social networking site where journalists help journalists get all this technology stuff and understand it’s import and impact on society and media.
Nice list of digital journalism all stars have already joined, ready to help, along with some people just getting started.
Here’s the mission statement:
WiredJournalists.com was created with self-motivated, eager-to-learn reporters, editors, executives, students and faculty in mind.
Our goal is to help journalists who have few resources on hand other than their own desire to make a difference and help journalism grow into its new 21st Century role.
You don’t need the best equipment, the biggest budget or even management support to accomplish worthy goals. The only requirement is a willingness to learn and a mind open to new ways of thinking about journalism.
We are here to help each other learn basic skills and learn how new technology and new societal expectations for media are changing journalism.
At WiredJournalists.com we are all teachers and we are all students. We help each other and learn together. Those who know more should help those who know less. Those with questions should never be afraid to ask them.
We don’t set standards. We encourage you to set your own, but we don’t judge each other’s work based on a-priori, Big-J Journalism approaches.
We believe modern journalism is about self-reliance and a “just do it” attitude. We want to see you learn how to get things done quickly without prejudice over quality or worries about what other journalists might think.
The skills you learn at WiredJournalists.com should help you either serve your community better — whether your publishers and editors recognize the value or not — or enable you to work independently as a self-contained, fully equipped modern journalist.
Pass the link around to your non-wired colleagues. All of them. Continue reading
Tagged Journalism, journalists, newspapers, wired, wiredjournalists
1 Comment
Departing editor O’Shea’s platitudes don’t withstand scrutiny
Who needs day-time soap operas when you have journalism in California to follow.
Between Crazy Wendy and tribulations at the Times, there is plenty of entertainment in the Sunshine State.
This week’s big news is the “force out” of LAT executive editor Jim O’Shea.
O’Shea reportedly told Tribune Co. employees,
One thing I want put on the record, though, is that I disagree completely with the way that this company allocates resources to its newsrooms, not just here but at Tribune newspapers all around the country. That system is at the core of my disagreements with David. I think the current system relies too heavily on voodoo economics and not enough on the creativity and resourcefulness of journalists….
WTF?
I mean, what the hell does that mean?
Look up “voodoo economics.” Does that really describe the supposed strangling of the Times through staff reductions?
And if you believe journalists are creative and resourceful, don’t you trust that if cuts are made, they will figure out a way to make it work?
I’m not passing judgment on anything related to Mr. O’Shea’s situation, just saying — WTF does he mean? His statement on its face is utter non-sense.
I don’t think these quotes should be skimmed over or passed on without a little examination. They resonate with a nice journalistic militarism, but they sound more like self-justifying rhetoric than anything helpful.
UPDATE: Howard Weaver addresses O’Shea’s one-percent solution. My additional comment would be: It seems like O’Shea forgot he was running a local newspaper.
UPDATE II: What he said — Jack Lail. Newsrooms today need leadership. Jim O’Shea didn’t provide it. Continue reading
Users-drive sites growing faster than MSM sites — much faster
TechCrunch has posted an interesting chart showing the fast growing web sites.
Take out the porn, and what you have are blogs, social networks, video and UGC sites. Some of the fastest growing encompass one or more of those content strategies.
There’s not a traditional media site in the bunch. Even the government (weather.gov) is kicking MSM’s butt.
Your audience is drifting away, MSM. Continue reading
Tagged Audience Growth, blogging, Media, social networks, ugc, Video, web2.0
1 Comment

Why newspaper sites will continue to struggle with reader participation
We’ve spent many words recently debating the best way for newspapers to manage user participation, particular comments on stories and forum posts.
Most journalists value quality communication and are distressed to see rants, insults, cursing, lies and innuendo pass for online commentary, especially on their own newspaper.com.
It’s an understandable position.
There are a number of strategies to try an elevate the nature of the discourse on a newspaper.com, such as enforcing real identity, or using a Slashdot/Digg-style reputation system, or pre-screening comments (my least favorite), to outsourcing the entire headache to Topix.
But have you ever stopped to wonder why quality blogs usually have quality discussions?
Consider, for a minute, how quickly a discussion on your newspaper.com would spin out of control if you allowed comments on a story about butts on TV. Now look at the interesting discussion on this Lost Remote post (maybe not the best example I could find of a great conversation, but it is a logical contrast to what might happen on a typical newspaper.com).
Some blogs get more and better reader discussion than others, but you rarely hear any more about bloggers debating whether to disable comments and wondering if this whole commenting thing is really worth it (as you do from some editors).
Sure, blogs use some form of pre-screen (first-time commenters on howardowens.com, for example, go into a moderation queue), but any filters on blog comments these days have more to do with trying to block spam than worries over the content of reader comments.
Why is that?
I would say, primarily because blogs get the close attention of their owners. There is little opportunity for trolls to get a foothold on a well-run blog. Most blog owners apply high standards for the conduct they will allow. They monitor closely. They participate in the conversation. In other words, they are actively engaged and involved. They are owners.
How involved are reporters and editors involved in participation on their web sites?
Not much.
And until we fix that weak link in our participation strategy, we will continue to struggle with developing the kind of online community our newspaper communities deserve.
Newsrooms need to develop an ownership attitude about participation on their web sites. Only then will the technology solutions really work. There is simply no substitute for real, sustained, dedicated participation in the conversation by editors and reporters. Without it, newspaper sites will continue to struggle to grow and retain audience. Continue reading →