Lo-fi video does not mean lo-fi results

Mindy McAdams left a comment on this post pointing to a video she found not boring. What I found most interesting is that the video was shot with lo-fi equipment, thereby proving that you do not, indeed, need to spend a lot of money to achieve quality results. The expense on this video is even less than anything I’ve ever proposed.

UPDATE: Here’s a post from Cyndy Green (the veteran TV-journalist turned teacher who produced the video above) where she talks a bit about using lo-fi gear to achive quality results.

Again, the point is it is not the gear that makes the story – it’s all in the mind of the videojournalist. Once you know the process and have the basic gear, you can do nearly anything.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged by . Bookmark the permalink.

One thought on “Lo-fi video does not mean lo-fi results

  1. Thanks for the comments – I’m always amazed when people think they need a gazillion dollars in gear to make a movie. George Lucas didn’t start that way. He shot 8mm, but he had a vision. That’s what news, documentaries, movies are all about – seeing the world in your own unique way. Had a student a while back who taught himself video production using the video feature on his cheap digital still camera and moviemaker. I’ve even heard of a workshop for high school students on how to use cellphone video to make movies. Can’t wait to see what comes out of that. While my focus is videojournalism, there is a lot of cross-pollination in the technology in all visual media.

Leave a Reply